UCT Physics PHY121F
Evaluation by students 2002

UCT PHY121F 2002 
Evaluation (by cmc)  on 25 May 2002    57 ex 75 replied.

LECTURES Enjoyment Mechanics Perez
average =  3.2
very bad  1   3*** 
          2  11*********** 
          3  26************************** 
          4   8******** 
very good 5   9********* 

LECTURES Enjoyment Astro Fairall
average =  4.8
very bad  1   0 
          2   0 
          3   1* 
          4  11*********** 
very good 5  45********************************************* 

LECTURES Enjoyment Thermal Comrie
average =  3.5
too easy  1   1* 
          2   6****** 
          3  23*********************** 
          4  20******************** 
too hard  5   7******* 

LECTURES Presentation Mechanics Perez
average =  3.4
very bad  1   0 
          2   8******** 
          3  25************************* 
          4  17***************** 
very good 5   7******* 

LECTURES Presentation Astro Fairall
average =  4.4
very bad  1   1* 
          2   0 
          3   7******* 
          4  14************** 
very good 5  35*********************************** 

LECTURES Presentation Thermal Comrie
average =  4.0
very bad  1   0 
          2   1* 
          3  16**************** 
          4  24************************ 
very good 5  16**************** 

LECTURER Stimulation Mechanics Perez
average =  2.9
very bad  1  11*********** 
          2   7******* 
          3  20******************** 
          4  12************ 
very good 5   7******* 

LECTURER Stimulation Astro Fairall
average =  4.0
very bad  1   3*** 
          2   2** 
          3  10********** 
          4  18****************** 
too hard  5  24************************ 

LECTURES Stimulation Thermal Comrie
average =  3.2
very bad  1   7******* 
          2   5***** 
          3  22********************** 
          4  14************** 
very good 5   9********* 

LECTURES Difficulty Mechanics Perez
average =  3.8
too easy  1   0 
          2   0 
          3  24************************ 
          4  22********************** 
very hard 5  10********** 

LECTURES Difficulty Astro Fairall
average =  2.8
too easy  1   2** 
          2  12************ 
          3  36************************************ 
          4   5***** 
very hard 5   1* 

LECTURES Difficulty Thermal Comrie
average =  3.6
too easy  1   0 
          2   0
          3  30****************************** 
          4  16**************** 
very hard 5  10********** 

LECTURES Pace Mechanics Perez
average =  4.0
too slow  1   0 
          2   0
          3  20******************** 
          4  19******************* 
too fast  5  18****************** 

LECTURES Pace Astro Fairall
average =  3.07
too slow  1   1* 
          2   2** 
          3  46********************************************** 
          4   6****** 
too fast  5   1* 

LECTURER Pace Thermal Comrie 
average =  3.4
too slow  1   1* 
          2   3*** 
          3  29***************************** 
          4  17***************** 
too fast  5   7******* 

LECTURES Approachabilty Mechanics Perez
average =  3.6
very bad  1   5***** 
          2   4**** 
          3  14************** 
          4   9********* 
very good 5  19******************* 

LECTURES Approachabilty Astro Fairall
average =  4.3
very bad  1   3*** 
          2   0 
          3   7******* 
          4  11*********** 
very good 5  29***************************** 

LECTURES Approachabilty Thermal Comrie
average =  4.1
very bad  1   2** 
          2   1* 
          3  11*********** 
          4  13************* 
very good 5  23*********************** 

COURSE Value of course   
average =  3.8

COURSE Value of weekly problem sheets 
average =  3.8

COURSE Value of afternoon tutorials 
average =  3.6

COURSE Enjoyment of Laboratory Course
average =  3.6

COURSE Value of Laboratory Course
average =  3.6

COURSE Class tutor (Mark Horner)
average =  3.2

COURSE Lab demonstrators and tutors
average =  3.7

COURSE Overall rating
average =  3.2