UCT PHY321F 2005 ELECTROMAGNETISM (ASCHMAN); THERMAL (CLEYMANS); COMPUTATIONAL (
FEARICK)
Evaluation on 29 May 2005: 9 ex 10 replied; analysis 050718
ELECTROMAGNETISM (ASCHMAN) Enjoyment of lectures
average = 3.89
hated them 1 0
2 0
3 3***
4 4****
loved them 5 2**
THERMAL (CLEYMANS) Enjoyment of lectures
average = 3.22
hated them 1 0
2 1*
3 5*****
4 3***
loved them 5 0
COMPUTATIONAL (FEARICK) Enjoyment of lectures
average = 3.33
hated them 1 0
2 3***
3 2**
4 2**
loved them 5 2**
ELECTROMAGNETISM (ASCHMAN) Presentation of lectures
average = 4.33
terrible 1 0
2 0
3 0
4 6******
brilliant 5 3***
THERMAL (CLEYMANS) Presentation of lectures
average = 3.44
terrible 1 0
2 0
3 5*****
4 4****
brilliant 5 0
COMPUTATIONAL (FEARICK) Presentation of lectures
average = 4.00
terrible 1 0
2 0
3 2**
4 5*****
brilliant 5 2**
ELECTROMAGNETISM (ASCHMAN) Stimulation by lectures
average = 4.11
very low 1 0
2 0
3 1*
4 6******
very high 5 2**
THERMAL (CLEYMANS) Stimulation by lectures
average = 3.33
very low 1 1*
2 0
3 5*****
4 1*
very high 5 2**
COMPUTATIONAL (FEARICK) Stimulation by lectures
average = 3.11
very low 1 0
2 2**
3 5*****
4 1*
very high 5 1*
ELECTROMAGNETISM (ASCHMAN) Level of Difficulty
average = 3.22
too easy 1 0
2 0
3 7*******
4 2**
too difficult 5 0
THERMAL (CLEYMANS) Level of Difficulty
average = 3.44
too easy 1 0
2 1*
3 4****
4 3***
too difficult 5 1*
COMPUTATIONAL (FEARICK) Level of Difficulty
average = 2.78
too easy 1 0
2 2**
3 7*******
4 0
too difficult 5 0
ELECTROMAGNETISM (ASCHMAN) Speed of lectures
average = 3.22
too slow 1 0
2 0
3 7*******
4 2**
too fast 5 0
THERMAL (CLEYMANS) Speed of lectures
average = 3.22
too slow 1 0
2 0
3 7*******
4 2**
too fast 5 0
COMPUTATIONAL (FEARICK) Speed of lectures
average = 2.89
too slow 1 0
2 1*
3 8********
4 0
too fast 5 0
ELECTROMAGNETISM (ASCHMAN) Lecturer approachability
average = 5.00
not at all 1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
very approachable 5 9*********
THERMAL (CLEYMANS) Lecturer approachability
average = 3.44
not at all 1 0
2 1*
3 5*****
4 1*
very approachable 5 2**
COMPUTATIONAL (FEARICK) Lecturer approachability
average = 3.89
not at all 1 0
2 0
3 3***
4 4****
very approachable 5 2**
ELECTROMAGNETISM Value and interest of module
average = 3.67
none at all 1 0
2 0
3 4****
4 4****
great module 5 1*
THERMAL Value and interest of module
average = 3.78
none at all 1 0
2 1*
3 2**
4 4****
great module 5 2**
COMPUTATIONAL Value and interest of module
average = 3.56
none at all 1 0
2 3***
3 1*
4 2**
great module 5 3***
ELECTROMAGNETISM Problem sets
average = 3.33
too easy 1 0
2 0
3 6******
4 3***
too difficult 5 0
THERMAL Problem sets
average = 2.89
too easy 1 0
2 1*
3 8********
4 0
too difficult 5 0
COMPUTATIONAL Problem sets
average = 3.11
too easy 1 0
2 0
3 8********
4 1*
too difficult 5 0
TUTOR usefulness EM=Driver
average = 3.33
useless 1 0
2 2**
3 2**
4 5*****
excellent 5 0
TUTOR usefulness TP=Hauer
average = 3.67
useless 1 0
2 1*
3 1*
4 7*******
excellent 5 0
TUTOR usefulness CP=Stankiewicz
average = 3.67
useless 1 0
2 0
3 4****
4 4****
excellent 5 1*
TUTORIAL SESSIONS (ELECTROMAGNETIC)
average = 3.25
not helpful 1 0
2 3***
3 0
4 5*****
very helpful 5 0
TUTORIAL SESSIONS (THERMAL)
average = 3.75
not helpful 1 0
2 1*
3 1*
4 5*****
very helpful 5 1*
TUTORIAL SESSIONS (COMPUTATIONAL)
average = 3.57
not helpful 1 0
2 2**
3 1*
4 2**
very helpful 5 2**
TEXTBOOK (ELECTROMAGNETISM) useful?
average = 3.89
not useful 1 0
2 1*
3 1*
4 5*****
very useful 5 2**
TEXTBOOK (THERMAL) useful?
average = 2.60
not useful 1 0
2 2**
3 3***
4 0
very useful 5 0
TEXTBOOK (COMPUTATIONAL) useful?
average = 2.50
not useful 1 0
2 1*
3 1*
4 0
very useful 5 0
WEBSITE (ELECTROMAGNETISM) useful?
average = 4.38
not useful 1 0
2 0
3 0
4 5*****
very useful 5 3***
WEBSITE (THERMAL) useful?
average = 1.71
not useful 1 4****
2 2**
3 0
4 1*
very useful 5 0
WEBSITE (COMPUTATIONAL) useful?
average = 3.14
not useful 1 0
2 1*
3 4****
4 2**
very useful 5 0
Laboratories: enjoyment
average = 3.44
hated them 1 1*
2 1*
3 2**
4 3***
loved them 5 2**
Laboratories: usefulness
average = 3.89
useless 1 0
2 1*
3 2**
4 3***
very useful 5 3***
Laboratory demonstrators (Aschman)
average = 4.50
useless 1 0
2 0
3 0
4 4****
very good 5 4****
Laboratory demonstrators (Driver)
average = 4.44
useless 1 0
2 0
3 1*
4 3***
very good 5 5*****
Classtests: worthwhile for you?
average = 4.00
not at all 1 0
2 2**
3 0
4 3***
very worthwhile 5 4****
Essay: worthwhile for you?
average = 4.22
not at all 1 0
2 1*
3 1*
4 2**
very worthwhile 5 5*****
Access to computers
average = 3.89
not adequate 1 0
2 1*
3 2**
4 3***
totally adequate 5 3***
Library material for course
average = 3.25
not adequate 1 0
2 1*
3 4****
4 3***
totally adequate 5 0
Course administration
average = 4.33
very poor 1 0
2 0
3 1*
4 4****
very good 5 4****
Rate this course compared to others
average = 4.56
worst 1 0
2 0
3 0
4 4****
best 5 5*****
dga/050718.2300